Breast Cancer Team (Youjin and Natalie) in DFA Northwestern
Team
You must be logged in to add comments.
1. We were able to prototype two concepts and looking to prototype a third next wee. We re-evaluated our users and decided to stick with assistive kitchenware with the elderly and those with arthritis as our users. We decided this based off of the feedback we received at the expo and through research.
2. We have come in contact with the Symphony of Evanston and will be meeting with their therapists and hopefully residents to gain feedback on our prototypes and to gain more insights.
3. Our team goal is to go to Norris on Friday and ask individuals to try out our prototypes and get feedback. Additionally, we are hoping to set up user interviews this week through Symphony of Evanston.
4. Our major obstacles are again finding users, but focusing on the elderly has helped us find more accessible users.
4 years ago ·
The four new questions:
1. What is our team's progress on the last goal, and what did we learn about our user(s) since then?
2. What else has our team accomplished that we are proud of since last meeting?
3. What is our team's goal (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-related) by next meeting?
4. What are the major obstacles stopping us from achieving this goal, and how will we resolve them?
4 years ago ·
1. What did we learn about our users today? Throughout an empathy exercise, we found that pouring is one of the most difficult motions. Additionally, we found gripping can be painful and difficult especially with more usage. We are focusing on pots.
2. Having already planned out what we are mocking up next week, we will just be preparing for prototyping and bringing in pots.
3. Finding users and prototyping without user validation.
4. Execution approach and tradeoffs between prototyping and user validation. Where should our time be spent.
4 years ago ·
1. Not much lol, solo research but more specific ideas of difficulties in the kitchen and reached out to a few specialists/users
2. By Tuesday, contact at least one user. Potentially start with interviews. Brainstorm solo if you can.
3. Lack of productivity and Paul2 says too good of social skills. We can't find users.
4. Need to ideate.
4 years ago ·
1. N/A
2. Reaching out to users and setting up interviews. Conducting independent online research.
3. Difficult access to correct user group. Getting enough insights to move on.
4. timeline for the quarter. Impact goal.
4 years ago ·
1. Discussed last week's insights and brainstormed HCWs and narrowed down to two.
2. Research existing solutions!
3. More research needed!!
5 years ago ·
1. went over user interview & key insights, brainstormed HCW's, narrowed HCW's
2. we'll decide on Sunday!
3. narrowing our HCW's, but we feel pretty good right now!
5 years ago ·
1. shared user journey maps (patient, survivor, metastatic patient, surgeon, oncologist), decided on focus (patient during treatment, synthesis by building on initial patient journey map & adding
2. research (as assigned)
3. perhaps a lack of knowledge about metastatic patients and if they undergo treatments (if so, what kind & under what circumstances)
5 years ago ·
1. Picked out key insights from user research and mapped out power relation and interest dynamics, assigned user journey map
2. Journey Maps and Meeting on Sunday at 9:45
3. Attendance and tardiness esp because of time
5 years ago ·
Check out this for flow diagramming: https://loft.io/process/dfa/immerse/information-synthesis/flow-diagramming/
5 years ago ·
1. Team Charter, Team name, Brainstorming focus area, research tasks
2. Research tasks and more firm understanding of focus area
3. none
4. focus area
5 years ago ·
At the end of every meeting, please answer these questions here on the activity feed:
1. What did we accomplish since last meeting?
2. What will we accomplish by next meeting?
3. What obstacles are impeding our progress?
4. What are the big decisions we are making right now? (optional)
5 years ago ·